tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11840140.post113878609516024799..comments2007-04-15T11:17:45.778+08:00Coderboihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04871987698709824497noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11840140.post-1162686482617607552006-11-05T08:28:00.000+08:002006-11-05T08:28:00.000+08:00Check out this post!..... <BR/>http://www.biznezsearch.com/editorials/<BR/><BR/>This web directory who themselves have been waiting "4 YEARS" to be listed on dmoz is sticking their neck right out! calling for Google and others to disregard the ODP. There's a few interesting comments on this blog. We need more of this cause' the ODP is CRAP!!!!k feldinghttp://www.corruptdmozeditor.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11840140.post-1152011255822273752006-07-04T19:07:00.000+08:002006-07-04T19:07:00.000+08:00There are always multiple editors per category. Listed editors in higher categories can edit below them, and there are over 100 editors with directory-wide permissions. Plus, Dmoz allows for more than one listed editor per category, too. Just keep in mind that reviewing suggestions is not editor's number one priority. Editors can find sites any where they want, and it doesn't have to be in the suggested pool.<BR/><BR/>No one editor can keep your site from being listed simply because many different editors can come along list it. Also, don't believe every thing you read on SEO forums because it's not based on truth, but rather myth. I challenge anyone who suspects editor abuse to take the time to fill out an abuse report - http://www.report-abuse.dmoz.org . But, instead they'd rather complain about about their assumptions rather than take action. Plus, most claims of editor abuse are found to be false anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11840140.post-1141883157988242702006-03-09T13:45:00.000+08:002006-03-09T13:45:00.000+08:00The Dmoz Editor's corruption is without limits. I sometimes think that the whole Dmoz directory is beyond repair. Its a great web directory and was built on a great concept of volunteerism. Yet right now more people hate it than those who love it. I hear of people's websites being removed for no reason, sites added that don't belong to the category, kick-backs, bribes, editors trying to sell their account on eBay... just to name a few. AOL/Netscape need to implement a drastic measure to take care of the corruption and the egotistical editors as a first step. Then they need to get with the times and put in place some better programs/scripts that will take care of the spam and make the wait time reasonable.<BR/>I started a website (<A HREF="http://www.DmozSucks.org" REL="nofollow">DmozSucks.org</A>) to deal with Dmoz and its problems.DmozSuckshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16630985122087222553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11840140.post-1139003477754180622006-02-04T05:51:00.000+08:002006-02-04T05:51:00.000+08:00Dmoz has <I>always</I> allowed multiple editors per category, but it doesn't happen very often except for large categories (consider that there are about 8000 editors and almost 700'000 categories!). As for requiring multiple "votes" to remove sites, it would make the system too bureaucratic IMO. However, I'd agree that more transparency regarding editor activities could be helpful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com